Skip to main content

Solutions

Voice measurement and human review

Resources for compliance, fraud, and technology teams evaluating voice and channel measurements, recording validity, and evidence for human review.

Resources

How to evaluate voice deepfake detection vendors

Evaluate voice-analysis vendors against the decision you need to support, the measured channel, the quality of their evidence and their deployment data terms. Distinguish a detector's classification claim from a measurement instrument and from speaker authentication.

Read resource

Voice measurement benchmark methodology and limits

The benchmark configuration is documented internally, with the corpus, partition and simulated codec chain identified. No headline performance figure is published here. A corpus benchmark does not establish performance on a customer's calls.

Read resource

What a phone channel does to voice measurements

Sonotheia's measurements are benchmarked on simulated wideband, G.711 and AMR-NB chains built from public spoofing corpora. They have not been validated on live telephone traffic. A real trunk adds handset, network and transcoding effects the simulation did not include, so it stays pending until measured in place. Zoom, Teams and WebRTC meeting audio are out of scope.

Read resource

Voice review records for compliance teams

A structured measurement record with the instrument version can support a compliance team's own review and SAR narrative preparation. It is not a qualified SAR filing or a determination that a reporting requirement has been met. The institution and its legal reviewers decide what to file.

Read resource

How to document voice measurements for review

Sonotheia measures physical properties of the voice and the channel in call audio and reports each one as nominal, deviated or unavailable, with the validity of the recording. A reviewer decides what to do with the result. Sonotheia does not decide whether a voice is synthetic.

Read resource