Skip to main content

Solutions

Voice fraud detection and governance

Query-targeted resources for compliance, fraud, and technology teams evaluating deepfake audio detection, voice liveness, and explainable governance for regulated voice channels.

Resources

How to evaluate voice deepfake detection vendors

Evaluate the best deepfake audio detection services on four dimensions: benchmark transparency (ASVspoof or equivalent), explainability under audit, deployment data boundaries, and governance artifact quality. Score-only APIs fail compliance review even when detection accuracy is acceptable.

Read resource

Voice fraud detection benchmark methodology and metrics

Physics-based anti-spoofing means measuring acoustic signal properties (spectral envelope trajectories and source excitation phase patterns) that synthetic pipelines struggle to reproduce consistently, then documenting those measurements for audit. Sonotheia reports Equal Error Rate (EER) and minimum Detection Cost Function (minDCF) on the ASVspoof5 evaluation partition (spoof attack types A17-A32).

Read resource

Telephony channel validation: codec survival for voice fraud controls

Voice fraud occurs over phone lines, not studio-grade microphones. Sonotheia validates acoustic signal survival through lossy telephony channels, specifically calibrating our physics-based sensors for wideband, G.711, and AMR-NB networks.

Read resource

Voice fraud SAR evidence guide: documenting synthetic media events

FINRA-supervised firms need auditable documentation when voice fraud involves deepfakes. The Sonotheia Voice Fraud SAR Evidence Guide helps compliance officers document synthetic voice events in Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with decision-trace evidence aligned to FinCEN and FINRA expectations.

Read resource